I named seven names of infinite cardinality

I named seven names of infinite cardinality in the spring 1997:
a, c, f, h, i, b, r, e, s, u....
where f was named by Cantor (the cardinality of power set of real number set), c is the cardinality of continuum (real number set, the power set of natural number set), a that of natural number set.
That is, h is the cardinality of power set of sets with cardinality f, i is that of cardinality h, b is that of cardinality i, r is that of cardinality b, e is that of cardinality r, s is that of cardinality e, u is that of cardinality s.
I have no interest to name more. Maybe you will name them in the future!

The origin of these names of cardinality:
h is the initial of human; i is the initial of Immortal; b is the initial of Buddha.
After many days, I found that h, i, b can be the outset of the word hibernate, which means that these complex entities have not been definitely studied in modern science. Then, the word resuscitate is used as the origin of r, e, s, u , which means that we must study the more complex world in the future!
Welcome to use these names of cardinality in the future study, if you prefer them!

Please the Immortals and Buddhas absolve my misdeed! I am not purposive, just need many names to express my estimation of the complexity of human brain in a infinite edition.

Cantor theorem can see http://eom.springer.de/C/c020260.htm , which is the online edition of Encyclopaedia of Mathematics (Edited by Michiel Hazewinkel).
"Cantor's epochal discovery was that the natural and the real numbers were of different cardinality. More generally, call the set of all subsets of a set S - the power set P(S). By his now-famous diagonalization argument, Cantor showed that P(S) was a higher cardinality than S, that is, P(S) was too numerous to be put into one-to-one correspondence with S."
See "Cantor's Concept of Infinity: Implications of Infinity for Contingence", by THE REVEREND BRUCE A. HEDMAN, Ph.D. : http://www.asa3.org/asa/PSCF/1993/PSCF3-93Hedman.html

Thank you for your comment!

How complex is human's brain?

"How complex is human's brain? " was published in 1997.

This is a two-page paper. The complexity of Human' brain are estimated in a infinite edition. Cantor's theorem, and a five-branch tree model of body are used in my estimation.

Page 1

Page 2 Thank you for your reading and comment!

My original conjecture of "gravitation-magnetic field"

My original conjecture of "gravitation-magnetic field" ,
see the following images. It was puslished in 1997.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2


Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Thank you for your reading!

Flag of Earth, flag of Mars, and my Blog's Profile

Flag of Earth:

Flag of Mars:

My design for my Blog's Profile (all rigts are reserved):

My conjecture of "gravitation-magnetic field" before 1997

It is said that Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity (General Relativity) has serious mistake. For example, Zhou Peiyuan thought that the principle of general covariance does not hold generally in physics (Zhou (Chou) Peiyuan, “On Coordinates and Coordinate Transformation in Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation” in Proc. of the Third Marcel Grossmann Meetings on Gen. Relativ. ed. Hu Ning, Science Press & North Holland. (1983), 1-20.). In case this would be true, “gravitation-magnetic field” (“gravomagnetic field” in shortening) is a candidate conjecture to substitute for General Relativity. This conjecture can be used to explain gravitational wave, to unify the electromagnetism and gravitation, and to explain the existing experiments of validating General Relativity.
The “gravomagnetic field” conjecture says that: (1) just like the moving electrical charge can generate the magnetic field, a moving mass can generate the gravomagnetic field. (2) the accelerating mass can generate a new kind of gravitational wave, similar to that the accelerating electrical charge can generate electromagnetic wave. Here the gravitational wave is not that in Einstein’s General Relativity.
More details of “gravomagnetic field” conjecture can see my paper in 1997.
We should notice that the “gravomagnetic field” conjecture was put forward by some of my senior high school classmates in 1980. This conjecture was not put firstly by me.
Here the “gravomagnetic field” conjecture is not a conception in the existing physics. It is a conjecture which needs to be proof-tested by experiments in the real world. We should not discuss it more theoretically, because physics is a kind of experimental science.

I am Zheng-Ling YANG